Student Assessment Workbook
Theory Tasks
Student Name: | |
Student ID No: | |
Start date of unit |
Application
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to prepare and cook a range of poultry dishes following standard recipes. It requires the ability to select, prepare and portion poultry, and to use relevant equipment, cookery and food storage methods.
The unit applies to cooks working in hospitality and catering organisations. This could include restaurants, educational institutions, health establishments, defence forces, cafeterias, kiosks, cafes, residential caterers, in flight and other transport caterers, and event and function caterers.
It applies to individuals who work under the guidance of more senior chefs. They demonstrate autonomy and judgement to complete routine activities and take limited responsibility in known and stable contexts within established parameters.
The skills in this qualification must be applied in accordance with Commonwealth and State or Territory legislation, Australian standards and industry codes of practice.
No occupational licensing, certification or specific legislative requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Internet link to unit
For detailed information about elements and performance criteria, foundation skills, performance evidence, knowledge evidence and assessment conditions, please follow the following link.
https://training.gov.au/Training/Details/SITHCCC035
Purpose of the Document
This Student Assessment Workbook contains details of your assessment tasks and the guidelines for you to be able to complete the assessments for this qualification.
Purpose of Assessment
Assessment is the process of gathering and judging of evidence to decide whether a student has achieved a standard of competence. Successful completion of all assessment tasks will contribute to the attainment of the unit of competency.
Training and Delivery Arrangements
A training plan will be provided to the student with the start date and end date of each unit.
The trainer will hand over the resources to read and inform the student to complete Assessment tasks according to timetable. The training department will make sure that the training location is WHS compliant and safe for the training and equipped with the necessary resources needed for the effective delivery of training.
Trainers will be using PowerPoint slides, discussions, role-plays, and class activities as part of training.
Assessment Arrangements
To be assessed as competent the participant must:
In judging evidence, the assessor must ensure and declare that the evidence meet the Rules of Evidence as:
The assessment process must:
An individual's access to the assessment process should not be adversely affected by restrictions placed on the location or context of assessment beyond the requirements specified in the training package.
The individual learner’s needs are considered in the assessment process. Where appropriate, reasonable adjustments are applied to take into account the individual learner’s needs (Refer to Pre-Training Review section).
The training department informs the learner about the assessment process and provides the learner with the opportunity to challenge the result of the assessment and be reassessed if necessary (Refer to Re-Assessment section).
Reasonable adjustments can be made to ensure equity in assessment for people with disabilities. Adjustments include any changes to the assessment process or context that meet the Individual needs of the person with a disability, but do not change competency outcomes. Such adjustments are considered reasonable if they do not impose an unjustifiable hardship on training department or employer or learner. When assessing people with disabilities, assessors are encouraged to apply good practice assessment methods with sensitivity and flexibility.
Assessors should also provide alternative assessment activities to address identified specific organisation requirements.
Assessment tools
The tools used, having multiple tasks, provide a foundation on which to build a comprehensive learning and assessment program. In the assessment workbook there are a range of assessment tasks. The types of activities are varied to ensure good "testing" of the required skills and knowledge. Trainers / Assessors will need to adapt or supplement these resources where appropriate.
A range of standard assessment methods are used within each assessment tool (refer to Methods of assessments)
Once all tasks have been completed, the file(s) containing answers to assessment workbook tasks should be submitted to the trainer/assessor and the assessor will give the detailed feedback.
Re-assessment
Learners who are assessed as ‘Not Yet Competent’ are to be provided with detailed verbal and written feedback to assist them to identify the gaps in their knowledge and skills to be addressed through further training and assessment. These learners are to be provided with additional training and learning support to target their specific gaps in knowledge and/or skills and prepare them for additional assessment.
It is the policy to provide additional training and re-assessment as required at no additional cost to the learner. Learner’s requiring additional learning support are to be brought to the attention of management so the progress of the learner can be monitored closely, and additional support services can be applied if required. Where learners repeatedly do not demonstrate competence following significant learning and assessment support, a learner’s enrolment can be determined through mutual agreement. Please note, learners are granted with 3 attempts for a successful assessment outcome. Where learners are unable to achieve competency after 3 attempts, they may be required to re-enrol in that unit/s and undertake further training.
There are four rules of evidence that guide the collection of evidence. The student’s work must demonstrate the rule of evidence e.g.
§ Valid – The assessment task must cover the required skills and knowledge.
§ Sufficient – it must be enough to satisfy the competency.
§ Current – skills and knowledge must be up to date.
§ Authentic – it must be the student’s own work and supporting documents must be genuine.
The four principles of assessment are followed in assessment of each student’s evidence of competence. The four principles are:
Reliability:
Evidence presented for assessment is consistently interpreted and assessment results are comparable irrespective of the assessor conducting the assessment.
Fairness:
The individual student’s needs are considered in the assessment process. Wherever appropriate, reasonable adjustments are applied to take into account the individual student’s needs. The training department informs the student about the assessment process and provides the student with the opportunity to challenge the result of the assessment and be reassessed if necessary.
Flexibility: Assessment is flexible to the individual student by:
For you to achieve competency in this unit, you are required to complete the following tasks and submit according to your proposed training plan, or the date specified by Trainer/assessor in particular cases (please see Access and Equity Policy and Procedure). The student instructions for each task have been mentioned before the start of each task. You must achieve satisfactory ratings on all tasks.
Within the context of these assessment tasks for role playing activities / presentations / demonstrations, the assessor may fill in the role of client, manager or supervisor, as applicable.
Assessments for qualifications are competency based, which means students are assessed against the unit of competency requirements. Assessment results are recorded as follows:
The student will receive written feedback from a trainer/assessor, clearly outlining why the student’s submitted work does not demonstrate the understanding of competency standards in the task and where the gaps are. The student will then be required to rectify these gaps and re-submit his/her assessment for marking.
Plagiarism and collusion are both forms of cheating. It is taking and using someone else’s ideas, writings or information and representing them as your own. Plagiarism is a serious act and may result in a participant’s exclusion from a unit or a course. When you have any doubts about including the work of other authors in your assessments, please consult with your Trainer/assessor and refer to the Student Handbook. In case you need further information about plagiarism and collusion, please ask staff to provide you with the copy of plagiarism and collusion policy and procedure. Alternatively, you may refer to the website. The following list outlines some of the activities for which a participant can be accused of plagiarism:
The students are required to use the right sources in their work. By doing proper referencing, you are acknowledging that you have used someone else’s information or work. The students are encouraged its students to use APA 6th referencing Style. You can visit http://guides.lib.monash.edu/citing-referencing/apa for the style information or visit https://www.refme.com/au/referencing-generator/apa/ for APA style references generation. You must reference all sources that you use in your assignment, including words and ideas, facts, images, videos, audio, websites, statistics, diagrams and data.
There are two parts to every referencing system:
Please ask your trainer if you do not know how to reference your evidence. Ensure your work is referenced to prevent plagiarism. For more information on plagiarism and referencing, refer to the Student Handbook.
Where a student disagrees with a decision made by Trainer/assessor regarding outcome of unit, plagiarism or cheating, he/she may pursue appeal proceedings in accordance with the complaints and appeals process given in Complaints and Appeals Policy and Procedure, as you have the right to appeal the outcome. More information about this process can be found in the Student Handbook or can be obtained from the Student Support Officials.
If you have special needs or disabilities, reasonable adjustment will be organised in accordance with the policies and procedures of reasonable adjustments. This may include but not limited to:
Examples of reasonable adjustment in assessment may include but not limited to:
The requirements for special needs must be established and an appropriate record must be kept of the efforts made to establish special need and the outcomes of these efforts.
Methods of assessments
There are two types of tasks for assessing the unit of competency for each unit.
The following methods are used for assessing the student.
Required Resources
Assessment Task Summary
Assessment Task | Assessment Method | Task Summary |
Assessment Task 1: Written Questions | Questions and Answers | Students must answer all given written questions. |
Assessment Task 2: | Project and Demonstration/role play ( Separate document) | Students are required to demonstrate skills to safely use commercial kitchen equipment to prepare a range of different food types, as per provided assessment tasks and instructions. |
Assessment task 1Written Questions:
The assessment will be conducted in supervised environment. The student can access the computer and internet in supervised assessment environment.
Assessment objectives
The student will demonstrate the knowledge required to prepare poultry dishes.
Deliverable specifications
The student must deliver answers to all the questions. The answers should be correct, sufficient and in acceptable form of quality and standard.
If you have been asked to explain or describe, provide your answer in sufficient words ( refer to Written answer question guidance), or as per instructions/requirements for individual question. If you have been asked multiple choice question, you must choose the appropriate answer in the given choices. If you think more than one of given choices are correct, in that case you can choose as many as you think are appropriate.
What do I need to submit?
What do I need to do if I get something wrong?
Written answer question guidance.
§ Explain – when a question asks you to ‘explain’, you will need to make clear how or why something happened or the way it is. Generally, you are expected to write a response of three to four sentences in length.
§ Identify – when a question asks you to ‘identify’, you will need to briefly describe the required information. Generally, you are expected to write a response of two or three sentences in length.
§ List – when a question asks you to ‘list’, this means you will need to briefly state information in a list format, often with a specific number of items indicated.
| ||
Poultry Cooking | Culinary Terms and Trade Names (minimum five each) | |
Ingredients commonly used in the production of different poultry dishes. | Herbs and Spices:
Aromatics:
Fats and Oils and dairy products:
| |
A variety of classical and contemporary poultry dishes |
| |
Different cuts of poultry |
| |
Styles of cooking of poultry dishes |
| |
| ||
Sauces which are mostly used to present poultry dishes (list minimum five)
| ||
Garnishes which are mostly used to present poultry dishes (list minimum five)
| ||
| ||
Chicken: Historical Origin:
Cultural Significance:
| ||
Turkey: Historical Origin:
Cultural Significance:
| ||
Duck: Historical Origin:
Cultural Significance:
| ||
Quail: Historical Origin:
Cultural Significance:
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
FIFO:
| ||
LIFO:
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Safe and effective methods (at least two) of using poultry by-products to reduce wastage and maximise profitability:
| ||
Safe and effective methods (at least two) of using off cuts to reduce wastage and maximise profitability:
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Poultry products and poultry dishes | Balance | Colour | Contrast | Fat content |
Chicken |
| |||
Duck |
| |||
Feathered game |
| |||
Poultry offal |
|
Question number 12 Continuing.
Poultry products and poultry dishes | Freshness | Other quality indicators | Size | Taste | Texture |
Chicken |
| ||||
Duck |
| ||||
Feathered game |
| ||||
Poultry offal |
|
Poultry cuts | Characteristics |
Breast |
|
Supreme |
|
Maryland |
|
Drumstick |
|
Thigh |
|
Wing |
|
Saute cuts |
|
Tenderloin |
|
Preparation Techniques |
Barding
|
Brining
|
De boning
|
Wet and dry marinating
|
Rolling
|
Trussing
|
Soaking
|
Stuffing
|
Ballotine
|
Galantine
|
Cookery Methods |
Braising
|
Deep frying
|
Grilling
|
Poaching
|
Roasting
|
Sautéing
|
Sous vide
|
Stewing
|
Poultry Products and Dishes | Suitable Preparation Techniques (Tick the appropriate and suitable techniques) | Suitable Cookery Methods (Tick the appropriate and suitable cookery methods) |
Chicken |
|
|
Duck |
|
|
Feathered game |
|
|
Poultry offal |
|
|
Poultry cuts | ||
Breast |
|
|
Supreme |
|
|
Maryland |
|
|
Drumstick |
|
|
Thigh |
|
|
Wing |
|
|
Saute cuts |
|
|
|
|
Types of Equipment | Features ( minimum 2) | Functions ( minimum 2) | Safe Operational Practices ( minimum 2) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|
Storing Purposes | Appropriate Environmental Conditions ( list at least two) |
Ensure food safety |
|
Optimise shelf life |
|
Cooking and cooling processes |
|
Timeframes and temperatures
|
|
Student Declaration:
| Signature: ________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
|
Note: Please access the simulated assessment tasks in a separate document.
Note to trainer assessor: The trainer/assessor will use the marking and observation checklist and unit assessment result sheet (provided in a separate document) to record the outcome of all assessment tasks. The trainer/assessor will provide feedback for the student in Comments /feedback section. Where any item/criteria have been marked as not satisfactory, outline the gaps in your feedback and document the actions that must be taken by the student to address the gaps. A copy of feedback must be provided to the student by the trainer/assessor. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.